[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issues with network file systems and CVS
From: |
Matthew Navarre |
Subject: |
Issues with network file systems and CVS |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:57:30 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.2 |
We've been using CVS with the repository exported via NFS to our UNIX boxen.
now we need to connect to another cvs repo at a remote site and the only
access the want to give us is via wincvs with the repository on a mapped
drive.
Now, just from discussion on this list I realise this is bad. My question is
what are the potential issues with this approach? I need a better answer than
"I've heard it's bad" to try and cut through the fog of developer inertia and
blinding stupidity we've got here, not that It'll help.
Could someone explain to me the issues with mounting the repo via a network
filesystem?
--
address@hidden Matthew Navarre
It was a hard sell, since he's a database person, and as far as I've seen,
once those database worms eat into your brain, it's hard to ever get
anything practical done again. To a database person, every nail looks
like a thumb. Or something like that. - jwz
- Issues with network file systems and CVS,
Matthew Navarre <=
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, david, 2002/09/17
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, Matthew Navarre, 2002/09/17
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, Frederic Brehm, 2002/09/17
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, Alan Dayley, 2002/09/17
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/09/17
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, Frederic Brehm, 2002/09/18
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, Mike Ayers, 2002/09/18
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, Eric Siegerman, 2002/09/18
- Pandora's Black Box (was: Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS), Mike Ayers, 2002/09/19
- Re: Issues with network file systems and CVS, Larry Jones, 2002/09/18