[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tag locking change
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
Re: Tag locking change |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:01:36 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 12:39:29 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Tag locking change
>
> Paul Sander writes:
> >
> > Another serious issue is when someone commits while an rtag is in
> > progress, and the new data are erroneously tagged.
>
> Anyone who does an rtag without specifying an explicit revision to tag
> gets exactly what they deserve.
This part I sort of agree with, though strictly to say such a thing
you'd have to force them to never tag against the head of a branch with
rtag.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/06
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/06
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change,
Greg A. Woods <=
- Re: Tag locking change, Eric Siegerman, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Mark, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Mike Ayers, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09