[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: branch info

From: Kaz Kylheku
Subject: Re: branch info
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:22:29 -0700 (PDT)

On 18 Jun 2003, Ronald Petty wrote:

> I just reread the rcsfile man page and had the following question.  This
> question might be answered if I read the source code to cvs, but I
> haven't yet.  
> Basically, why do you need have
> branches      {num}*; 
> under the delta node (grammar).
> It seems to be redundant because the 
> num
> that is listed for the given delta has all that information (branch
> points).

No, it doesn't.

> ex.  If the node num is
> Why have in the branch field, unless I read the man page wrong

You wouldn't have in the branch field for that node. What you
would have is zero or more numbers referring to nodes that start
branches based on that node. Their numbers would be where X
is some even integer.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]