info-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Followup Question Re: RESEND Re: Strange behaviour with export


From: Mike Holloway
Subject: Followup Question Re: RESEND Re: Strange behaviour with export
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:17:27 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Hi Mark: Thanks. I was able to determine that. What I don't understand is why it won't seem to export to the current working directory in the remote case, but does it just fine on local. If it's a "feature" I'ld like to understand why?

Mark D. Baushke wrote:

Mike Holloway <address@hidden> writes:


Hi: I sent this a week ago with no response.  I'm a newbie to the list
and not sure how to interpret silence.  I saw a couple of resends that
got response, so I figured waiting a week would be a good amount of
time to wait.  Any input would be much appreciated.  Thanks.  Mike


You need to use a directory other than "." for the export:

  cvs export -D now -d somedir a/b/somefile

will work with cvs 1.11.6

        -- Mark


Mike Holloway wrote:


Hi:  I'm using cvs v1.11.5 and I've noticed some odd behaviour.  If
I execute the incantation:
cvs export -D now -d . a/b/somefile
on a local repository, I get the expected version of somefile in the
directory I executed from.  However, if I have CVS_RSH=ssh and
CVSROOT set to point at the exact same repository, but prefixed with
:ext:address@hidden: and work from another machine, the above
incantation fails with:
[export aborted]: cannot export into a working directory.
If I replace the . with a new directory name, it works fine, as does
a checkout.
I found something about a bug close to this at
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-cvs/2001-05/msg00040.html but
I'm not using pserver and I was under the impression that export did
not ever create the CVS admin directory, so I'm a bit stumped.
Can someone explain what could be happening, if its a bug, and, if
so, is it fixed in a later version or still outstanding.
Thanks in advance for any insight provided.. Mike








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]