RE: Support for CVS-1.12.9

[Lane, Jim]

That makes sense.   I will be careful about keeping my mail plain text and
attachment free.  My last message to info-cvs did wind up in the list:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-08/msg00011.html, but
received no response.   I don't claim to be a great author, so I may well
have not explained the question well enough for anyone to understand what I
was asking.    Likewise, my message to bug-cvs went unanswered:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-cvs/2004-07/msg00138.html

This, coupled with my seeing very little about 1.12.9 mentioned in info-cvs
has me wondering.

Anyway, thank for the heads-up -- JimLane




-----Original Message-----
From: Jim.Hyslop [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 3:52 PM
To: Lane, Jim; 'address@hidden'
Subject: RE: Support for CVS-1.12.9


Lane, Jim wrote:
> Is CVS-1.12.9 being supported?   I rarely, if ever, see 
> 1.12.9 mentioned in this mailing list and all
> questions/problems/bugs that I sent to this list or the bug 
> list have been met with stony silence.     Have I made a 
> mistake  upgrading to 1.12.9?

I think it's more likely a problem with your messages getting out. I had a
quick look at the archives,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-09/index.html, and didn't
see anything from you in September.

Another possibility might be the MIME encoding - some people on this list
don't read MIME-encoded messages (not everyone uses a GUI mail client ;-).
Try asking your questions again, and post using plain text only. I will try
to remember to reply to any mesages from you, even if I don't know the
answer - that way, you'll at least know your posts are getting through.

-- 
Jim Hyslop
Senior Software Designer
Leitch Technology International Inc. (http://www.leitch.com) Columnist,
C/C++ Users Journal (http://www.cuj.com/experts)