[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Question re: deleted tags
From: |
Christopher.Fouts |
Subject: |
RE: Question re: deleted tags |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:04:09 -0500 |
I understand WHY now. Since val-tags is just a cache,
where is the "real" tags repository. Again in my last
post, I said I did NOT see the deleted tag in val-tags
anymore, and don't see a tag that should still be there.
-chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry Jones [mailto:address@hidden
>Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 5:56 PM
>To: Derek Price
>Cc: Fouts Christopher (IFNA MP DC); address@hidden
>Subject: Re: Question re: deleted tags
>
>
>Derek Price writes:
>>
>> Since tag deletion is considered a relatively rare operation
>(as well
>> it
>> should be), no one has ever bother to write the code for the
>expensive,
>> complete tag search that would be necessary to determine if
>the tag is
>> really completely gone and should really be deleted from val-tags.
>
>It's not necessary -- since val-tags is just a cache, it would
>be safe to just delete it regardless. Of course, the first
>thing that needs to be done is to add some kind of locking for
>the val-tags file since there isn't any right now and the more
>we update it the better the chance of it getting corrupted by
>simultaneous updates.
>
>-Larry Jones
>
>I'm so disappointed. -- Calvin
>
RE: Question re: deleted tags, Christopher.Fouts, 2005/01/19
RE: Question re: deleted tags,
Christopher.Fouts <=
RE: Question re: deleted tags, Rick Genter, 2005/01/20
RE: Question re: deleted tags, Christopher.Fouts, 2005/01/20