[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS Tagging
Re: CVS Tagging
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:59:16 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, address@hidden wrote:
> Currently we use CVS to control our files, and when we do a release we
> tag the files and then place all the files that have to be released
> under this tag within another folder on CVS. This then contains the
> only the files that are being release, perhaps a subset of all the
> files that were tagged (as not all the files changed, so don't
> required to be released)
> Thing is, this is not my way of working with CVS and i think they have
> it wrong, for various reasons. However there keen on being able to do
> 'patches' without having to do a full release, and tagging the patched
> files with a different version, which is fine. Any thoughts on there
> process, improvements, i don't think they would go down the road of
> branching per release just for patches.
I personally tag everything and check differences between tagged releases,
but I can also see your point above.
> Also if you only have two files within the whole repository that have
> been tagged with a tag and then do a checkout on that tag, do you only
> get those two files?
Yes you do - only those two.
Peter Toft, Ph.D. address@hidden http://petertoft.dk
Følg min Linux-blog på http://www.version2.dk/blogs/petertoft
Køb billet nu til årets bedste open source, Linux og BSD-konference:
*** Linuxforum 2007 -> http://linuxforum.dk/2007/ ***
- CVS Tagging, stuart . graham . nis, 2007/02/14
- Re: CVS Tagging,
Peter Toft <=