[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spam, imap: false pos: use-BBDB-exclusive, use-blacklist,
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: spam, imap: false pos: use-BBDB-exclusive, use-blacklist, |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Nov 2004 12:30:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) |
>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
Ted> Open the article(s) in question, hit `t' to display
Ted> everything, then run the following functions:
Ted> M-: (spam-split 'spam-use-BBDB 'spam-use-blacklist
Ted> "SPAM.REAL") M-: (spam-split 'spam-use-BBDB-exclusive
Ted> "SPAM.HAM")
Ted> What do you get?
Ted> These two tests simulate exactly what happens when the mail
Ted> is split. If you get the results you expect, something else
Ted> is wrong. If you don't, you need to send me your BBDB,
Ted> blacklist file, and message(s) that are not processed
Ted> correctly.
Ok now after some testing, there is in fact a problem:
I never receive anything in SPAM.HAM (which is the place for possible
false positive)
More concrete a couple of mails, which are NOT in my BBDB and NOT in
my blacklist ending up in SPAM.REAL instead of SPAM.HAM
>> I get
>>
>> M-: (spam-split 'spam-use-BBDB 'spam-use-blacklist "SPAM.REAL")
>> "SPAM.REAL"
>>
>> M-: (spam-split 'spam-use-BBDB-exclusive "SPAM.HAM") "SPAM.HAM"
Again, when I apply the above functions I get "SPAM.REAL" *AND*
"SPAM.HAM" that looks wired it should be either "SPAM.REAL" *OR*
(exclusively) "SPAM.HAM".
I send you privately the mail in question together with my blacklist
(my BBDB seems not relevant here.)
Thanks
Uwe
Ted> Generally, you re-train on them, un-registering them as spam
Ted> and then registering them as ham.
Right, but could I use in principle spam-stat, even on a imap server,
either with agentize or with
(setq nnimap-split-download-body t)?
- Re: spam, imap: false pos: use-BBDB-exclusive, use-blacklist,,
Uwe Brauer <=