[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering.
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering. |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:14:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.15 (linux) |
>>>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
>>>>> "Reiner" == Reiner Steib <reinersteib+from-uce@imap.cc> writes:
Reiner> On Thu, Jan 13 2005, Tim McNamara wrote:
>>> Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
Uwe> [snip]
Reiner> "[POSIBLE SPAM]:" is equal to "[ABEILMOPS ]:", i.e. one of the
Reiner> letters ABEILMOPS or Space, followed by a colon.
It seems to be entirely a question of regexp, so the string
[POSIBLE SPAM]: is just added, like
[POSIBLE SPAM]: Fantastic InvestOrs News
So I tried ("Subject" "[\\[POSIBLE SPAM\\]*]" "SPAM.POSS")
using interactive regexp search, the expression
[\\[POSIBLE SPAM\\]*]
found
[POSIBLE SPAM]: Fantastic InvestOrs News
however when putting it into my .gnus file, the splitting method did
not find it. So does isearch-forward-regexp behaves differently from
putting this string in a function which uses a regexp search???
Thanks
Uwe
- How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Uwe Brauer, 2005/01/12
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Tim McNamara, 2005/01/12
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Reiner Steib, 2005/01/13
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Uwe Brauer, 2005/01/13
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering.,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Aidan Kehoe, 2005/01/13
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Uwe Brauer, 2005/01/13
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Cor Gest, 2005/01/13
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Uwe Brauer, 2005/01/14
- Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Cor Gest, 2005/01/14
Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering., Hubert Chan, 2005/01/14