[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Link considered unsafe
From: |
ky |
Subject: |
Re: Link considered unsafe |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:03:39 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
[...]
> Actually I was wondering why it is unsafe to visit links in w3m. If
> anything, w3m is the safest web browser I use daily, much better than
> IE, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, or Safari because it doesn't even attempt to
> run JavaScript. What personal information is this talking about?
[...]
We considered image tags, that will be accessed without clicking
those links. By special letters laid in the url, spammers will
know that your mail address is reachable.
- Re: Link considered unsafe, (continued)
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Paul Mead, 2009/07/08
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Reiner Steib, 2009/07/08
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/07/08
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Paul Mead, 2009/07/09
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Paul Mead, 2009/07/28
- Message not available
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/07/28
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Paul Mead, 2009/07/29
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Reiner Steib, 2009/07/29
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Paul Mead, 2009/07/30
- Message not available
- Re: Link considered unsafe, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/07/30
- Re: Link considered unsafe,
ky <=