Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?

[Sivaram Neelakantan]

On Sat, Feb 25 2017,Eric Abrahamsen wrote:

> Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I usually mark articles that I want to read later with a * and it
>> stays in the group, which is fine.  However they disappear as new new
>> articles come in and I have to get them back by hitting Y c .  Is there
>> a way to keep them in the summary buffer but the usual expiry of non
>> marked articles happen?
>
> I usually tick the articles, with "!". Does that work the way you want?
>
>


Right, what's the difference between * and ! then?  I was told to use
* a few years back.  I believe I mentioned that I wanted to keep the
article around indefinitely

sivaram
--