info-gnus-english
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[which hook?] (was: [defadvice, advice-add ])


From: Uwe Brauer
Subject: [which hook?] (was: [defadvice, advice-add ])
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:22:05 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

> Uwe Brauer via "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs
> Usenet newsreader (in English)" <info-gnus-english@gnu.org> writes:


> Most nadvice pieces, including :before advice pieces, are passed the
> arguments that are passed to the advised function.
> `gnus-summary-followup-with-original' is always called with at least one
> argument.  You can just throw all arguments away:
> (defun my-toggle-bcc-check (&rest _) ...).  Was it that?


Thanks


> But my remark was hinting at something different, actually: _instead_ of
> advising, in which way ever, would it be possible to use a hook instead?


Right, I prefer hooks always  over advice and friends, but I just cannot
come up with the appropriate hook in this case.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]