[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [defadvice, advice-add ]
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: [defadvice, advice-add ] |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:08:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> Uwe Brauer via "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs
> Usenet newsreader (in English)" <info-gnus-english@gnu.org> writes:
> Most nadvice pieces, including :before advice pieces, are passed the
> arguments that are passed to the advised function.
> `gnus-summary-followup-with-original' is always called with at least one
> argument. You can just throw all arguments away:
> (defun my-toggle-bcc-check (&rest _) ...). Was it that?
So the following seems to solve my issues with advice
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun check-my-to-field (&optional arg)
"This function will be run before you execute followup. And it
warns you if your email address is not in the To field. That
warning is a safty message if you had been only on the BCC
field!!"
(interactive "P")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Thanks!!!
Still the function should be generalised with a more sophisticated
search, but right now it more than sufficient for my purposes and just a
couple of minutes ago I faced a situation where I was in the BCC
BTW I am still wondering that such a functionality is not implemented,
yet.
Uwe Brauer
- Checking if user-mail-address is in To or CC (to avoid an embarrassing social situation) BCC, Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/10
- [Solution of sorts] (was: Checking if user-mail-address is in To or CC (to avoid an embarrassing social situation) BCC), Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/10
- Re: [Solution of sorts], Michael Heerdegen, 2025/02/10
- Re: [Solution of sorts], Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/11
- [defadvice, advice-add ] (was: [Solution of sorts]), Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/11
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Michael Heerdegen, 2025/02/11
- [which hook?] (was: [defadvice, advice-add ]), Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/12
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ],
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Christoph Groth, 2025/02/12
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/13
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/15
- [a better solution without using advice] (was: [defadvice, advice-add ]), Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/22
Re: Checking if user-mail-address is in To or CC (to avoid an embarrassing social situation) BCC, James Thomas, 2025/02/11