[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking if user-mail-address is in To or CC (to avoid an embarrassi
From: |
James Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: Checking if user-mail-address is in To or CC (to avoid an embarrassing social situation) BCC |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Feb 2025 03:44:25 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Uwe Brauer via "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs
Usenet newsreader (in English)" <info-gnus-english@gnu.org> writes:
>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>
>> Have you ruled out using the message-prune-recipient-rules and
>> message-dont-reply-to-names in (info "(message) Wide Reply")? They may
>> be enough for you (I haven't read your code).
>
> Thanks, but these have very different purpose. You use them to avoid
> doble sending to addresses you know in advance.
> My use case is very different as I described in my first posting. So I
> cannot know beforehand which address to include in one of these rules!
Sorry I meant the 'message-wide-reply-to-function' in the same page.
On the face of it, it seems to cover this use case:
> Robert can only avoid this by using a function (before replying to
> all) that checks whether the sender was included in the original
> email’s *To* or *CC* fields.
--
- [defadvice, advice-add ] (was: [Solution of sorts]), (continued)
- [defadvice, advice-add ] (was: [Solution of sorts]), Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/11
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Michael Heerdegen, 2025/02/11
- [which hook?] (was: [defadvice, advice-add ]), Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/12
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/12
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Christoph Groth, 2025/02/12
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/13
- Re: [defadvice, advice-add ], Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/15
- [a better solution without using advice] (was: [defadvice, advice-add ]), Uwe Brauer, 2025/02/22
Re: Checking if user-mail-address is in To or CC (to avoid an embarrassing social situation) BCC, James Thomas, 2025/02/11