[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Jailkit-users] Best Method of Updating Jailed Executables & Libs?
From: |
Olivier Sessink |
Subject: |
Re: [Jailkit-users] Best Method of Updating Jailed Executables & Libs? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:57:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060812) |
Calvin Cannon wrote:
[..]
> Nearly all of my jails are identical in all respects. Perhaps the
> update utility could run off of a config file that would define which
> files should be updated. It would also be nice to be able to fine-tune
> things like chmod settings for individual files. Some of my jailed
> files have chmod settings that are not the same as the host system.
>
> I'm envisioning a command line call something like this:
>
> jk_jailupdate <config-file> /full/path/2/jailA/root
> [/full/path/2/jailB/root] [etc...]
> - and/or -
> jk_jailupdate -l <config-file> <jail-list>
>
> Some of this functionality might already exist simply by using basic
> command line tools with the current jk_ tools. However, I /think /the
> current jk_ utilities will break my chmod settings if I don't re-set
> them manually.
so we need some options to control what will be updated:
- executables
- libraries (lib*.so)
- regular files
we also need options to control what will be updated:
- only the file content
- permissions
and we need options to specify where they will be updated (which jails)
I think for a utility like this is would be nice if it could be done
without config file. If you want to run it regularly you can always
store the options in a cron script.
regards,
Olivier