RE: [Jailkit-users] RE: ERROR: failed to execute shell /usr/sbin/ jk_lsh

[Scott Pendergast]

Very interesting, that does seem to be the case, although I'm not sure how
as they were complied in place on the alpha.

file jk_lsh
jk_lsh: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for
GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped

Is there a specific flag I must pass to get the native alpha binary built?

Thanks,

Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Sessink [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 5:00 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Jailkit-users] RE: ERROR: failed to execute shell
/usr/sbin/jk_lsh


Scott Pendergast wrote:
> little more potentially relevant info.  Failing box (front-end) is Alpha
> arch (uname -a Linux cp01 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4axp #1 Wed Dec 14 23:11:33 MSK
> 2005 alpha alpha alpha GNU/Linux)
> 
> and working box (back-end) is Intel (uname -a Linux orlnfs02
> 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Oct 6 06:21:39 CDT 2006 i686 i686 i386
> GNU/Linux)

could it be that the executables in the jail are x86 binaries, and not 
alpha binaries? That would explain the problem 'failed to execute'.

what is the output of
`file /content/RAW-Incomming/usr/sbin/jk_lsh` ?

regards,
        Olivier


_______________________________________________
Jailkit-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/jailkit-users

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.19/587 - Release Date: 12/14/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.19/587 - Release Date: 12/14/2006