[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Koha-devel] Call number handling in 3.0
From: |
Joshua Ferraro |
Subject: |
Re: [Koha-devel] Call number handling in 3.0 |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:10:15 -0500 |
On 2/25/08, Chris Cormack <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yeah, we cant use these variables in the templates, as what is in them is
> controlled by sysprefs, ie itemcallnumber is going to be empty unless people
> are using item level callnumbers
item-level callnumbers are really the only valid type of callnumber,
since callnumber refers to shelf location and bibs don't have shelf
location. There's a separate concept of 'classification' that can
appear at the bib level, but it's really not used very much in
practice in libraries, other than as a reference point. Shelf browse
lists, etc., are generated from the item-level itemcallnumber, which
should always be populated for every item.
> Its a tricky one as Nicole says, some libraries use dewey and LC .. so we
> need to display both.
The fields dewey and classification don't exist anymore, we now have:
itemcallnumber (combined full call number at the item level) and we
have cn_source and cn_sort (for sorting rules based on the cn_source
value as defined in Administration->Classification Filing Rules)
At the bib level we have biblioitems:
cn_source
cn_class
cn_item
cn_suffix
cn_sort
dewey and classification no longer exist and should be replaced at the
bib level with a concatenation of cn_item . cn_item . cn_suffix and at
the item level with itemcallnumber.
Please see the following reference:
http://wiki.koha.org/doku.php?id=en:development:callnumbers
Hope that helps.
--
Joshua Ferraro SUPPORT FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE
CEO migration, training, maintenance, support
LibLime Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS
address@hidden |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS
> Chris
>
>
> On 2/26/08, Owen Leonard <address@hidden> wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, call number handling is generally broken in 3.0,
> with
> > no realy standard for how to display call numbers. Some templates use
> > <!--TMPL_VAR NAME="itemcallnumber" -->, some use <!--TMPL_VAR
> > NAME="classification" -->, some use <!-- TMPL_VAR name="dewey" -->.
> >
> > Which is correct, or is there a better way to handle call numbers in a
> more
> > generalized way?
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> > --
> > Web Developer
> > Athens County Public Libraries
> > http://www.myacpl.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Koha-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Koha-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
>
>