[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?
From: |
Volkmar Uhlig |
Subject: |
RE: emulating no-senders notifications in L4? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Dec 2001 16:46:09 +0100 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 12:40 AM
>
> Espen Skoglund <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > If the handler doesn't do
> > so the task will merely loop on generating exception, but
> this is not
> > much different from a task going into an endless programmed loop.
>
> Except that traditionally in Unix such tasks get blown away with
> SIGILL, and we should do the same thing too.
That is still possible by deleting the task.
A misbehaving thread/task is always under the control of the trusted
task server. That server can perform the shoot-down.
- Volkmar
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, (continued)
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Espen Skoglund, 2001/12/21
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/21
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/23
- Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Espen Skoglund, 2001/12/24
- Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/25
- Re: Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Espen Skoglund, 2001/12/26
- Re: Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/27
- Re: Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Adam Olsen, 2001/12/27
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/20
RE: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?,
Volkmar Uhlig <=
RE: Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Volkmar Uhlig, 2001/12/27