[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts about the new X.2 spec...
From: |
Espen Skoglund |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts about the new X.2 spec... |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:12:52 +0100 |
> I really dislike TheWayOfNamingFunctions. IMHO (and a lot of people
> share my opinion, it's even in the GNU Coding Standards) that's
> ugly, but it seems to be some sort standard for OO languages. I
> think names_like_this are much better.
I really hope that this is the last time function/variable naming for
the L4 API will be discussed (on the other hand, every specification
needs to have some bikesheds, right? ;-) If people like the other way
of naming they can simply have some header file that redefines the
names. E.g.:
#define L4_SpaceControl l4_space_control
#define L4_ReplyWait l4_reply_wait
So, can we please let these silly non-problems rest?
eSk