Re: New thoughts about deva/fabrica

[Bas Wijnen]

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:38:02AM +0200, ness wrote:
> who a) has been part of the first argumentation about the posix level
> drivers

That's easy to look up, but not very relevant when you see my second answer.

> and b) is allowed to should come to a decision

IMO, anyone who's writing the code.  If I feel like writing (and I do, but
it's a bit harder than I hoped), I can decide what I implement.  If you don't
like my approach, but are not going to write anything which you think is
better, then that's bad luck for you.

Of course, if the approach is so unacceptable that it can't go into CVS,
that's a different story.  But I think we would've heard about it already, if
that were the case.

Thanks,
Bas

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature