[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why kernel REVOCABLE COPY is difficult
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Why kernel REVOCABLE COPY is difficult |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:53:20 -0400 |
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 03:12 +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The one thing that makes me put these in-kernel heaps on the "deferred"
> > list rather than the "forget" list is my concern that hardware context
> > switch performance is getting steadily worse, and that microkernel
> > designs may have to compromise purity to remain competitive. This is
> > disturbing, but it may be inevitable.
>
> Is it really getting worse? I read that someone managed to bring L4 IPC
> on Itanium down to 36 cycles. In view of the *theoretical* scalability
> of the different processors, this seems about similar to the 121 cycles
> L4 claimed on Pentium 1.
There exist processors that do context switch perfectly well. Even so,
the IA32 will remain the most important target for a long time, and on
that platform things are getting steadily worse.
shap
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, (continued)
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Why kernel REVOCABLE COPY is difficult, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/09
- Re: Why kernel REVOCABLE COPY is difficult, olafBuddenhagen, 2005/10/10
- Re: Why kernel REVOCABLE COPY is difficult,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- space banks and DMA, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/13
- Re: space banks and DMA, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- DMA vs. Persistence, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- General driver DMA (in EROS), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Approaches to storage allocation, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/09
- Re: Approaches to storage allocation, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/12
- Re: Approaches to storage allocation, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/12
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/17
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/17
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/18