[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
application shell (was: Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor)
|
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
|
Subject: |
application shell (was: Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:55:33 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi,
> GIMP is actually a really good example, and what it really reveals
> is the need for an interactive graphical shell and a model of
> applications that are "plug ins".
Note that this desirable also for the sake of usability. (I haven't
written anything on this so far, however.)
-antrik-
- setuid vs. EROS constructor, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/12
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, ness, 2005/10/12
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/12
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jun Inoue, 2005/10/12
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jun Inoue, 2005/10/13
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Michal Suchanek, 2005/10/13
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jun Inoue, 2005/10/15
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/15
- application shell (was: Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor),
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Re: application shell (was: Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor), Jun Inoue, 2005/10/16
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jun Inoue, 2005/10/16
- Server granularity, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/15
- Re: Server granularity, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/16
- Re: Server granularity, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/17
- Connectivity, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/17
- Re: Connectivity, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/17
Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/13