[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On Compatibility
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: On Compatibility |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:21:29 +0200 |
I work in a building with over 200 people.
My univ. is a building with aprox 1000 people, exlcuding students.
All use Emacs.
That's why every major computer dealer bundles some Office suite
with their computers. That's why MS produces Office.
I fail to see what non-free software has to do with anything.
It's a HUGE cash cow. That's why the whole OASIS OpenDoc thing is
such a big deal too.
No, it isn't, the reason why it is a huge deal is because of freedom.
As far as multi-user systems, they generally operate as servers.
There are a few places where people still use dumb terminals with a
VT-100 intepreter for everything, but every office in every country
I've done work in uses PC's connected to file and print servers.
Every _big_ building uses something akin to a dumb terminal (usual
crap like SunRay's or what not that can handle X sessions remotley)
since maintaining 300 something PC's is a nightmare.
As far as "installed by default", if it's not, then the average
user won't use it.
FireFox isn't installed by default, for some odd reason a lot of
people use it... Which contradicts your statement quite badly.
I've got plenty of real-life examples of average computer users
that I deal with every single day. It's an eye-opening experience.
So have I.
- Re: On Compatibility, (continued)
Re: On Compatibility, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/25
RE: On Compatibility, Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25
RE: On Compatibility, Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25
- Re: On Compatibility,
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
Re: On Compatibility, Jonathan Shapiro, 2005/10/25
Re: On Compatibility, Jonathan Shapiro, 2005/10/25
Re: On Compatibility, David Hazel, 2005/10/25
RE: On Compatibility, Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25