l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: design goals vs mechanisms


From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: design goals vs mechanisms
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:21:25 +0200
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (Sanjō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

[re persistence]

At Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:38:06 +0200,
Bas Wijnen <address@hidden> wrote:
> mechanism for other goals.  I think we may want it as a goal by itself as
> well (unplugging the computer without need for explicit recovery is a nice
> thing), but probably low priority, so it may very well be dropped.

To be perfectly honest: I think it's pretty cool, even for its own
sake.  However, that is not really a good technical argument, and
persistence doesn't come for free, so that's why I am putting my
"careful hat" on.

Thanks,
Marcus






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]