[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Name spaces in programming languages
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Name spaces in programming languages |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:39:14 +0200 |
As usual, you failed to quote the relevant part of the email you're
replying to. That is very unfortunate because it makes it next to
impossible to seriously discuss a specific technical issue with
you. In particular, you missed my point on functional languages.
Too bad.
I quoted all relevant parts, I was talking about _most_ lisp's. You
answered with Guile which isn't really a lisp in the classical sense
to begin with! Now think Common, Zeta, Mac, NIL, .... All of the
classical lisps has a globally mutable name space, you _can_ subdivide
it a bit, but not much.
- Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/27
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages,
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27