[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:18:23 +0100 |
[...] A reasonable limit is necessary.
Being _ABLE_ to set a limit is necessary. But setting a globally
static limit like PATH_MAX is not that solution, if you increase
PATH_MAX then you will need to recompile the whole system, and one
program might not work on a different version of the system; this
won't happen if you just allocate the memory for the filename.
As I suggested, provide a way to limit resources.
- On PATH_MAX, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/11/02
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/03
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/03
- Re: On PATH_MAX,
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/04
- Message not available
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/04
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/03
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/03