Re: On PATH_MAX

[ness]

Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 20:00 +0100, ness wrote:
>
> > > The client cannot grant a guarantee that the client does not have. The
> > > client's schedule is revocable, therefore any schedule that it might
> > > grant is revocable.
> >
> > Why should a given schedule be revokable?
>
>
> If you cannot revoke schedule, how do you correct an erroneously issued
> schedule?

I'm not an expert and I have not yet read anything about reservation 
based scheduling, but let me raise the question: why should a schedule 
be issued erroneously?

> > > Also, do you have any idea how complicated this would be to actually
> > > implement? Or to use?
> >
> > Well, I not really. I imagine it extremely complicated. Currently this 
> > only a thought experiment for me.
>
>
> Fair enough.
--
-ness-