[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Reliability of RPC services
From: |
Christopher Nelson |
Subject: |
RE: Reliability of RPC services |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:13:25 -0600 |
> > Obviously, you will then not use the Hurd. Not only for
> this, but for
> > a number of other reasons as well.
I would also like to mention, if I'm not going to use the Hurd, who like
me will? And why? If a few people install it on their desktops, how
has that empowered anyone over installing Linux or Solaris or Windows
for that matter? You WANT museums and libraries and universities to
install it, because then you have empowered a great many people. Not
just the few technocratic elite that understand why it's so good.
-={C}=-
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, (continued)
- RE: Reliability of RPC services, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/26
- RE: Reliability of RPC services, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jesse D. McDonald, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jesse D. McDonald, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jesse D. McDonald, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Michal Suchanek, 2006/04/27
RE: Reliability of RPC services,
Christopher Nelson <=
RE: Reliability of RPC services, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/27