Re: No need for CC, please

[Bas Wijnen]

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:33:12PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> > > AFAIK mutt only looks at the addresses when doing list-reply, not
> > > how the mails arrived. So it shouldn't matter whether you reply to
> > > the list copy or the CC.
> > 
> > ... which of course won't work for the direct copies you get, as they
> > don't have any List-* headers.
> 
> Again, when using the list-reply function, mutt looks *at the
> addresses*, not at any List- headers. (That's precisely why you have to
> configure "lists" by hand.)

No.  If no configured list addresses are found in the header, mutt does indeed
follow List-* headers when doing list reply.  This means that in the absence
of any configuration, it will still do the right thing for normal list
messages.

> Configured properly, it will do the right thing, *no matter whether you are
> replying to the list mail or the direct mail*.

That is correct.

Thanks,
Bas

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature