[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Restricted storage
From: |
Tom Bachmann |
Subject: |
Re: Restricted storage |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:12:49 +0200 |
[sorry if this is messed up, I'm writing it in a webmailer]
> > Agreed. The dependency tradeoff would be more accurately be captured as:
> >
> > TC+OS vs.
> > Owner+OS+Installer
> >
> > Further: in a system supporting TC these are not mutually exclusive.
>
> You mean for some parts you can have one, and for other parts the other? I
> agree.
Let's assume for a moment that there are legitimate cases for both trust
relationships. It sounds like an interesting challenge to design a system that
works for both cases. (I'm unsure whether this is possible at all, but before
making a decision (and thereby excluding legitimate cases), I want to be sure).
_____________________________________________________________________
Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000071
- RE: Restricted storage, (continued)
Re: Restricted storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/06/01
Re: Restricted storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/06/01
Re: Restricted storage, Lluis, 2006/06/01
Re: Restricted storage, Michal Suchanek, 2006/06/01
Re: Restricted storage,
Tom Bachmann <=