[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we really think at a new OS design nowadays ?
From: |
Benno |
Subject: |
Re: Can we really think at a new OS design nowadays ? |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Aug 2006 09:51:55 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
On Sat Aug 05, 2006 at 19:50:05 +0200, Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Here is the start point of my reflexion :
>
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2006-04/msg00053.html
>
>I believe that we can do extremely complex and reliable software with a
>few people, thanks to the powerful formal and design tools available now.
>
>Moreover, I think that this OS has to support three key things to be
>able to survive ( an essential key to have a long term development ) :
>synergy ,transition & usability.
>
What does synergy mean, and why is it a key to an OS?
Benno
- Re: HURDNG : Which type of OS design could we have to think nowadays ?, (continued)
- Re: HURDNG : Which type of OS design could we have to think nowadays ?, Ernst Rohlicek jun., 2006/08/07
- Re: HURDNG : Which type of OS design could we have to think nowadays ?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/08/08
- Re: HURDNG : Which type of OS design could we have to think nowadays ?, Ernst Rohlicek jun., 2006/08/11
- Re: HURDNG : Which type of OS design could we have to think nowadays ?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/08/11
- Re: HURDNG : Which type of OS design could we have to think nowadays ?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/08/12
- Re: HURDNG : Which type of OS design could we have to think nowadays ?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/08/12
Re: Can we really think at a new OS design nowadays ?,
Benno <=