Re: Retracting the term ownership (was: Re: Separate trusted computing designs)

[Pierre THIERRY]

Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 01/09/2006 hora 00:36:
> > DRM is an unfortunate perversion of this technical capability.
> My current opinion is that the analysis indicates that it is not a
> perversion of the technology, but that the perversion is inherent in
> the technology, because of the inherent nature of information as
> non-proprietarizable.
> 
> Interestingly enough, the same argument shows that the technology
> fundamentally doesn't work in the long run.  However, even if it
> doesn't work in principle, its attempted implementation can
> potentially do a lot of harm in the meantime.

I must admit I'm a bit confused here: what argument shows that the
technology fundamentally doesn't work in the long run? And what do you
mean exactly by this?

Curiously,
Nowhere man
-- 
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature