[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regarding "HURD"
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: regarding "HURD" |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:57:01 -0500 |
Arnuld:
Daniel's reply did not go to the list. Did he intend that it should be
private?
[I assume Daniel writes:]
> > GNU has it's own micro-kernel it's called GNU Mach, this is the official
> > micro-kernel of the Hurd. Maybe you should work on that?[1] I don't
> > think there are too many people who are willing to work on a completely
> > new micro-kernel, and you'd be hard pressed to write a decent one by
> > yourself.
>
> IIRC, GNU Mach is derived from CMU Mach. so we have not built our own
> from scratch according to our own design principles.
>
> > [1] http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Mach/GNUMachRevivalProject
>
> i will check it before i post anything further.
There is a long list of things this group does not completely agree
about: DRM, GPLv3, design of a new operating system. One thing that the
group *does* agree about -- and most notably, the architects of the
original Hurd system agree about this -- is that the Mach kernel has
failed us.
shap
- regarding "HURD", arnuld, 2006/11/07
- Re: regarding "HURD", arnuld, 2006/11/07
- Re: regarding "HURD",
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- list administration trivia (was: regarding "HURD"), Thomas Schwinge, 2006/11/08
- Re: regarding "HURD", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/08
- Re: regarding "HURD", olafBuddenhagen, 2006/11/09
- Re: regarding "HURD", B Douglas Hilton, 2006/11/13
- Re: regarding "HURD", olafBuddenhagen, 2006/11/14