[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDL issue
|
From: |
Tom Bachmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: IDL issue |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:11:27 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070328) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Espen Skoglund wrote:
> The one
> argument I can think of in favour of returning the result value is a
> performance related one. The architecture calling conventions [...]
These stubs are supposed to be inline anyway, I guess. This wouldn't
matter then.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGkohfvD/ijq9JWhsRAo5zAJwM+vo0/L3D3b9SMACvk0K7pawOMwCeNlwO
BJsfmufWcg7BAtLCVE9VhMk=
=wt/x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, (continued)
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/07/10
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/07/11
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/07/11
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/07/11
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/07/11
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Sam Mason, 2007/07/10
Re: IDL issue,
Tom Bachmann <=