Re: Broken dream of mine :(

[olafBuddenhagen]

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:35:02AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:

> Your system is basically equivalent for the purposes of being "drm
> capable" but loses some functionality.

Another thing you keep reiterating that makes no sense whatsoever. If
it's easy to implement opaque memory for DRM, it's also easy to
implement it for the (alleged) positive use cases. If it's hard to
implement it for positive use cases, it's also hard to implement it for
DRM.

On the whole, we believe that it's better not to make it easy.

You claim that it doesn't matter either way: if something is possible in
theory, it's as good as if was already implemented. This of course is
total nonesense too. It's possible in theory to implement a capability
system on top of Linux, so why even bother with other designs? It's as
good as if Linux already implemented them...

-antrik-