[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?)
From: |
arnuld |
Subject: |
Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?) |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2018 12:43:15 +0530 |
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:32 PM, William ML Leslie <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Rust is one option. But remember that the Hurd is not a kernel, it is
> user-space implementation of functionality that has typically lived in the
> kernel. For the sake of both security and ease of development, critical
> parts could be written in rust (or ATS, or Nim), and less critical parts in
> guile or so.
That is a brilliant idea William. Even I thought of either ATS or Rust
and using guile for rest.
It is more of like how Emacs was written. Lower parts in C and rest in
Emacs Lisp.
--
http://uttre.wordpress.com/
https://lispmachine.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/c-new-operator/
- Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Paul Boddie, 2018/05/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Rick Hodgin, 2018/05/23
- Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), arnuld, 2018/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Aw: Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Nala Ginrut, 2018/05/24
- Re: Aw: Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), William ML Leslie, 2018/05/24
- Aw: Re: Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Arne Babenhauserheide, 2018/05/25
- Re: Re: Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), William ML Leslie, 2018/05/25
- Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Nala Ginrut, 2018/05/29
- Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), William ML Leslie, 2018/05/29
- Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Paul Boddie, 2018/05/29
- Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?),
arnuld <=
- Re: Aw: Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Paul Boddie, 2018/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Rick C. Hodgin, 2018/05/24
Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Richard Braun, 2018/05/24