Re: [ladcca] ladcca and /etc/services

[Bob Ham]

On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 17:58, guenter geiger wrote:

> I found a way to get along without changing /etc/services,
> which is using the portnumber instead of the "ladcca" service
> in the getaddrinfo call.
> 
> My question:
>  Is this an acceptable change, is there another way to use ladcca without
> /etc/services or is there no way around adding the entry ?

I didn't realise you could give getaddinfo the port number in a string. 
It's certainly an acceptable change; I'd like it to use /etc/services
first and then the port number if that fails.  If you want to send a
patch, go right ahead.

Cheers,

Bob

-- 
Bob Ham <address@hidden>

"At some point, keystroke recorders got installed on several machines at
Valve. Our speculation is that these were done via a buffer overflow in
Outlook's preview pane." -- Gabe Newell on the Half-Life 2 source leak

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part