[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Libcdio-devel] 'volname' command
From: |
R. Bernstein |
Subject: |
[Libcdio-devel] 'volname' command |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:11:43 -0400 |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò writes:
> Hi,
> As I"m still writing the eject drop-in replacement, I'm thinking if I should
> replace also the 'volname' command which is provided by current eject
> package.
> Still I don't think it's something for unieject as that's an "Eject"
> package,
> and volname seems something more useful if it was added on libcdio itself.
I'd like to believe libcdio is trying to make it easier more portable
in writing CD-ROM applications. So unless there is widespread dissent
on this mailing list (but generally things are a bit quiet if not
down-right apathetic) I'm in favor of adding into libcdio.
> If this is the case, I can try to code a volname replacement using
> libcdio/libiso9660 and then change Gentoo's portage to use that volname as
> default (or at least try to see if it's ok for other devs, too, this is just
> my opinion about this command).
In addition to the above libcdio statement/goal, I like to believe the
libcdio project also welcomes, fosters and solicit opinions and
comments. (Well, actually many of them have been negative, perhaps
because the API is bit bloated; but that's okay too. And if someone
wants to unbloat it, that too is much welcomed and appreciated!)
In sum, I think unless there are vehement objects (again see comment
above on verbosity/apathy), it will happen pretty much as you want it
to happen.