[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious
|
From: |
Edd Barrett |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious |
|
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2019 15:36:37 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) |
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 03:34:51PM +0000, Edd Barrett wrote:
> After consulting the SCSI docs, the first request differs in that it requests
> 37 bits, whereas the subsequent request 18 bits.
Did I say bits? It's probably bytes.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
- [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Edd Barrett, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Edd Barrett, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Edd Barrett, 2019/01/27
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious,
Edd Barrett <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/27
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Edd Barrett, 2019/01/27
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/27
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/26
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Rocky Bernstein, 2019/01/26