[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious
From: |
Edd Barrett |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:04:57 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) |
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 05:18:52PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> This all looks like a calibration attempt to determine the permissible
> size of a transaction. (Once per track could make sense with mixed
> mode CD where sector sizes vary from track to track.)
I see.
So assuming that's correct, it seems libcdio is quite chatty about
things which me might expect to fail.
I wonder if the errors should only be shown if an environment variable
is set or something?
Maybe that's a lot of effort...
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
- [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Edd Barrett, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Edd Barrett, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Edd Barrett, 2019/01/27
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Edd Barrett, 2019/01/27
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/27
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious,
Edd Barrett <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/27
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/01/26
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious, Rocky Bernstein, 2019/01/26