[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Minimum forking support

From: Raphael Mack
Subject: Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Minimum forking support
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 21:10:25 +0200


sorry for the late response. For me it is also working and it is good to
have these fixes in bell.

To try on yet another machine (ET) you could have added a real test
case. An example is good for sure, but examples for wrappers are only
compiled, not executed. For curtiss (note, there are two 's') I think we
should try to improve the coverage a lot in this area. - I think of
having "Liberty/test/wrappers/posix"...


Am Mittwoch, den 18.05.2016, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Paolo Redaelli:
> Hi Raphael,
> I've been reviewing the status of wrappers and I think that I should
> commit this diff to provide a really minimal support to forking and
> waiting. 
> It's really really simplicistic, the bare minimum to justify the
> existence of the "posix" wrappers which I should obviously improve to
> release curtis. 
> I tested the forking exampple on two installation:
>       * on my developing machine with "rolling" version of compiler
>       * on my cloud server with rc1
> They both compile and run as expected. I've checked (with
> src/wrappers/scripts/ which uses class_check) that no
> syntax error is introduced but as we are in RC I think it's wise with
> someone else also checks they run on his/her machines.
> If it is the case I'll commit it.
> Happy hacking 
>  Paolo

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]