[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ECMA's 'attached' type semantics
|
From: |
Hans Zwakenberg |
|
Subject: |
ECMA's 'attached' type semantics |
|
Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 12:14:03 +0200 (CEST) |
Hi group,
what does it take to implement ECMA's 'attached' type semantics?
This question popped up after realising that using this would be an instrument for avoiding calls on void targets, as documented in ECMA 8.11.20 and as alluded to by Cyril in the past.
cheers
Hans
- ECMA's 'attached' type semantics,
Hans Zwakenberg <=