Re: ECMA's 'attached' type semantics

[Paolo Redaelli]

Il 04/09/24 12:14, Hans Zwakenberg ha scritto:

Hi group,

 

what does it take to implement ECMA's 'attached' type semantics?

    Diving in the compiler source code, study its structure and design
    quite extensively...

 

This question popped up after realising that using this would be an instrument for avoiding calls on void targets, as documented in ECMA 8.11.20 and as alluded to by Cyril in the past.

    ... in fact this much desirable change require changes in many parts
    of the compiler. I wish I could say I have the required knowledge,
    but sadly currently I couldn't. I'm working to fix this as I also 
    wanted to implement "convert".