[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] libmicrohttpd: keep-alive connection alternative?
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] libmicrohttpd: keep-alive connection alternative? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:16:22 -0600 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Monday 25 August 2008 03:48:09 pm Andreas Røsdal wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> > On Monday 25 August 2008 12:28:46 pm Andreas Røsdal wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I'm using libmicrohttpd as a HTTP server, and wonder how I should
> >> configure libmicrohttpd optimally for the way I am using it.
> >> I think that HTTP keep-alive connections support would be perfect,
> >> but since that appears to be unspported I wonder about alternatives.
> >
> > Unsupported by what? MHD should support keepalive / persistent
> > connections. Obviously your proxy may not support them, but MHD should.
>
> Thanks for the help. It might very well be that my proxy is being used
> incorrectly, I will admit that. How can I find out of keep-live is being
> used, eg. how many connections are actually open towards libmicrohttpd?
I'd start with "netstat -nt"
Christian