[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[libmicrohttpd] Re: Bothersome guy, me.
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
[libmicrohttpd] Re: Bothersome guy, me. |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:31:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-25-generic; KDE/4.4.2; i686; ; ) |
A: You are allowed to re-use response objects (if the response is exactly the
same and your callbacks support it, etc.; that's why there is
MHD_destroy_response after MHD_queue_response: you might still use the
response object again), but obviously you don't have to. In some apps, you
might get performance benefits from re-using response objects, in others it
might not matter. Modifying a response (adding headers, etc.) after queuing
it could result in undefined behavior (especially for threaded modes).
Note that if you do not set a DATE header in the response, MHD will create an
appropriate (fresh) date header each time the response is used, so this semi-
mandatory variable component of an HTTP response does not prevent response
reuse.
Happy hacking!
Christian
On Sunday, October 24, 2010 12:13:43 pm Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> Q:
> Are you supposed to create a new response with
> MHD_create_response_from_callback each time an HTTP request comes in?
>
> This is what I do in my code. Or should I create the response once,
> and then just use over and over again?
>
>
> response = MHD_create_response_from_callback(args...);
>
> MHD_add_response_header(response, "Content-Type", "text/xml");
>
> ret = MHD_queue_response(connection, MHD_HTTP_OK, response);
>
> MHD_destroy_response(response);
>
> return ret;
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [libmicrohttpd] Re: Bothersome guy, me.,
Christian Grothoff <=