[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?
From: |
Luke-Jr |
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:55:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.15-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:50:00 PM Nils Durner wrote:
> as the PlibC implementation of select() does more than just interleave
> between Windows' select() and pipe polling, I don't see how "getting
> rid of plibc" would actually make sense (other than to please the
> masses ;-)).
What else does libmicrohttpd depend on Plibc for?
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, (continued)
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Evgeny Grin, 2013/10/16
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/16
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Christian Grothoff, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Christian Grothoff, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?,
Luke-Jr <=
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, LRN, 2013/10/23
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/14