[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:00:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 |
I would add that I personally would prefer to see such an implementation
of WebSockets kept outside of libmicrohttpd.so proper. HTTP
Upgrade/switching protocols is part of the HTTP core standard and thus
must be provided by MHD. However, WebSockets is something that can and
should be separate, as modular solutions are better.
So ideally, a "libmicrowebsockets.so" would just take the 'upgraded'
socket returned by MHD and go from there (and maybe provide some helper
functions to set the required Websocket-specific HTTP headers).
On 11/14/2016 05:51 PM, Evgeny Grin wrote:
> Implementations are welcome. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Markus Doppelbauer, 2016/11/13
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Christian Grothoff, 2016/11/13
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Markus Doppelbauer, 2016/11/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Evgeny Grin, 2016/11/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Markus Doppelbauer, 2016/11/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Evgeny Grin, 2016/11/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Markus Doppelbauer, 2016/11/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Evgeny Grin, 2016/11/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade,
Christian Grothoff <=
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Markus Doppelbauer, 2016/11/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Protocol upgrade, Junker, Gregory, 2016/11/14