[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:43:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
On 09/18/2018 02:35 PM, Santos Das wrote:
> Thanks Christian.
>
> I have a question on "MHD_OPTION_CONNECTION_MEMORY_LIMIT" . I went
> through the manual. How does this affect the send/recv buffer size per
> client connection. What does it eventually translate to?
It does not directly translate. Basically, the send/recv buffer for the
application payload is whatever is left after MHD allocated storage for
the HTTP header. So if you have a 32k buffer and a 1k header, you may
have 30+ kb for send/recv of payload, but if you have a 32k buffer and
an 8k HTTP header, you might have only 24k for the send/recv buffer.
0x939E6BE1E29FC3CC.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, (continued)
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Christian Grothoff, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Kunal Ekawde, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Christian Grothoff, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Kunal Ekawde, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Christian Grothoff, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Santos Das, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Christian Grothoff, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Santos Das, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Santos Das, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Christian Grothoff, 2018/09/18
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control,
Christian Grothoff <=
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Regarding Flow control, Christian Grothoff, 2018/09/18