[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] From LGPL 3.0 to LGPL 2.1?
|
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] From LGPL 3.0 to LGPL 2.1? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2019 09:50:57 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
On 5/18/19 5:16 AM, silvioprog wrote:
> I'm linking GnuTLS into my library.
>
> I have a doubt. Should any library which links GnuTLS be lisenced under
> LGPL 2.1 too?
LGPL does not require this, but of course you should make your library
Free Software. But you are free to, for example, link LGPL v2.1+ with
LGPL v3+, or GPLv3+ --- or virtually any other license. It does not have
to again be LGPL v2.1.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature