[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [fossil-users] [OT] Who's interested in projec
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [fossil-users] [OT] Who's interested in project management & collaboration tools? And...
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:06:50 -0400
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Michal Suchanek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Fossil is almost but not quite such a wiki. It has built in wiki that
is not versioned,
The built-in wiki is versioned. The interface is such that it does not show the version DAG, however, and there are no provisions for doing merges and whatnot. The user interface could be enhanced to show the DAG and to allow merging, if there is a real need for that. Wiki changes propagate using clone and sync just like code changes.
The issue is that each wiki page has its own DAG which is independent of the code and every other wiki page.
and versioned documents that are not editable
through the fossil web UI. If you modified fossil to make the
versioned documents editable you can use the clone and autosync
features to propagate changes.
D. Richard Hipp